New clients get 50% off their first order.

Client Reviews

What students and researchers say about our proofreading, editing and formatting

4.8

Based on 3,541 reviews

5 stars
2,985
4 stars
520
3 stars
36
2 stars
0
1 star
0

All Reviews

Showing 2,089–2,100 of 3,541

used them for my architecture dissertation which was half images. they checked every caption and figure reference, found three figures I'd numbered twice

Tbh I was expecting the usual essay mill vibe but it's a legit editing service, they wouldn't touch my content, only language. Good.

I don't write reviews usually but this deserves one.

I was going to submit without proofreading. So glad a friend talked me out of that. They found an entire paragraph I'd pasted twice.

For my gig economy project I'd interviewed delivery riders. The editor tidied my transcription excerpts without changing any of the participants' words, exactly as asked

This is my second review because I used them again for my PhD after my masters. Still brilliant

They gave me the choice between "light edit" and "full edit" and explained the difference honestly. Went with light, was plenty

Wrote my thesis on Tamil cinema. Zero attempts to anglicise any names or terms. So respectful

They caught that I cited Smith (2019) in text but Smith (2018) in the references. Six times across the document with different authors. Crazy

Used them for my dissertation on coastal erosion in Norfolk. Quality was great. Their upload limit meant I had to split my file which was annoying

They're very good. I'm a slow writer and a slower proofreader so this saved me.

I study sports science and play rugby, my writing is not my strength lol. Got a 2:1 which is better than I expected