used them for my architecture dissertation which was half images. they checked every caption and figure reference, found three figures I'd numbered twice
What students and researchers say about our proofreading, editing and formatting
4.8
Based on 3,541 reviews
Showing 2,089–2,100 of 3,541
used them for my architecture dissertation which was half images. they checked every caption and figure reference, found three figures I'd numbered twice
Tbh I was expecting the usual essay mill vibe but it's a legit editing service, they wouldn't touch my content, only language. Good.
I don't write reviews usually but this deserves one.
I was going to submit without proofreading. So glad a friend talked me out of that. They found an entire paragraph I'd pasted twice.
For my gig economy project I'd interviewed delivery riders. The editor tidied my transcription excerpts without changing any of the participants' words, exactly as asked
This is my second review because I used them again for my PhD after my masters. Still brilliant
They gave me the choice between "light edit" and "full edit" and explained the difference honestly. Went with light, was plenty
Wrote my thesis on Tamil cinema. Zero attempts to anglicise any names or terms. So respectful
They caught that I cited Smith (2019) in text but Smith (2018) in the references. Six times across the document with different authors. Crazy
Used them for my dissertation on coastal erosion in Norfolk. Quality was great. Their upload limit meant I had to split my file which was annoying
They're very good. I'm a slow writer and a slower proofreader so this saved me.
I study sports science and play rugby, my writing is not my strength lol. Got a 2:1 which is better than I expected